As some of you may have seen, this week I have an article on the Huffington Post, which has so far gotten nearly 600 comments, most of them negative, some vitriolic. It’s been interesting watching the comments pile up faster than I can read them, let alone respond. Mostly they haven’t bothered me because it is clear that the anger people feel toward religion has very little to do with me, though I am trying to understand it.
I don’t have a clear analysis yet, just a sense that what my writing tries to do—help people get past their negative stereotypes of God and find a mature connection to the Divine that’s not based on coercion—is needed more than I realized, not to force a different kind of religion on the atheists who clearly aren’t interested, but to offer an alternative to all those people who are searching for something, but think that religion is just an evil institution that makes people feel guilty and starts wars.
Despite the sense that I have something to offer, I’ve had two problems in responding to the comments. First, I have almost no work time during what is both my last week home with the kids and the official launch of the paperback (today!). Whatever time I spend reading or responding to comments is detracting from something else that feels more urgent. (I have the sense that some of the frequent commenters just want to hook others into a time-suck.)
But second, I find I am unsure how to respond to comments that seem so intent on attack. There is a tone to many that is all about ridicule, rather than dialog, which one friend pointed out was typical of our polarized political culture. Though I did make a few comments early on, I don’t want to engage in that kind of conversation, especially when my time is so limited. The problem, I’m realizing, is that by leaving the conversation, I’m yielding the stage to the bombasts. I fear something similar is happening on the national stage. Are we who disagree with them voicing a coherent alternative to Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin? Are we speaking up when we need to? Liz Opp raises a similar question in her recent blog post.
Next Tuesday, the kids go back to school, and despite an exciting, but busy speaking schedule, I’m hoping for a little more mental space to figure out what I’m called to say amid all the shouting.
I'm reminded of Randall Munroe's commentary-through-satirical-comic on Internet exchanges on issues which inflame passion, which aligns pretty closely with the serenity prayer:
http://xkcd.com/386/
Great cartoon, Thomas!
Thanks for the mention, Eileen. I keep watching and waiting for an opportunity to join something locally to affirm tolerance and freedom of religion when I myself am living with so many questions…
Blessings,
Liz Opp, The Good Raised Up
The negativity means different things on different levels.
1) The contemporary conventional wisdom of some groups is that "Religion is evil"; and people generally award themselves brownie points any time they can stick up for their local conventional wisdom– while doubting conventional wisdom makes them anxious.
2) People don't want to have to change their minds, or consider that they may have been wrong about something important. They get warm fuzzies from being able to dismiss religion-as-they-know-it; any hint that there's any truth in religion revives the very fears they thought they were done with.
3) God is a big, hairy, sort of Being. It's said that God is good, but do people easily trust that?– Is this big, hairy Being really safe to have around? What about Katrina and tigers and Republicans; if there's Someone in charge, and He lets this sort of thing happen, how safe can He be?
4) Atheists need God too, but don't like to think so. Agreed, they don't need God forced on them; and since other people have tried that, they defend against any such risk. But there's a tension inside, because God's in there with them! Atheists & God are having a family quarrel, and it doesn't mean there's no love at work, just a fear of loving dangerously, and a strong sulk to be maintained.
I find it helpful to read the Gospels as if I were in the crowd listening to Jesus respond to those who disagreed with him.
Thanks, Forrest and Diane. I think I might need to go reread the Gospels from that viewpoint.
bagsokbagsokbagsokbagsokbagsokbagsokbagsokbagsokbagsokbagsokbagsokbagsokbagsokbagsokbagsokbagsokbagsok
Thanks for your sharing!
I really enjoyed this site. This is such a Great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. It gives in depth information. Thanks for this valuable information.